Legalizing Drug Use Essay example -- Philosophy, Marx, Mill, Locke

The arguments that I contri excepte just fit(p) out are not perfect and they mystify some(a) apparent flaws that some philosophers would strongly differ with, while there are other arguments that some of the great philosophers would concord with. I entrust critique the arguments that I construct just laid out using the perspective of three different philosophers who all have their own ideas of how the state should function and the role of the citizen. The three philosophers that I testament use in this critique will be Karl Marx, bum Stewart plodding, and John Locke. The reason why I picked these three philosophers is be grow they all agree with some aspects of my writing, while differing with others. One will disagree with the role of the state and the citizens, but agree with legalizing recreational drug use, while the other two will agree with the role of the state and citizens, but disagree with legalizing drug use.Karl Marx is the philosopher who would disagree wit h some of the arguments that I presented above. The reason why Marx would disagree with so many of my arguments is because he is a strong believer of the state being in charge of ordination and having complete control over the citizens. In the decree that I created, it is largely a free society where the people are in charge of their actions and the government has a hold role in the daily transactions that are occurring between citizens. Marx would believe that in my society where there are different social classes, these classes would always be in a battle with one another and will be exploiting the disappoint class so they can make a bigger profit.In my society where the political economy is capitalism, there will be a wide variety of incomes. Some citizens will have more smarts, other... ...vious philosophers have showed that there are some minor critiques on my theory except the general theories and principles are generally accepted and promoted in the writings of Mar x, Mill, and Locke. Marx was the besides one who would agree with the legalization of recreational drug use, while Mill and Locke would not have been in favor of it because of the harm it would likely cause to other people who would be involved by the use of these drugs. In regards to the function of the state, Mill and Locke would have agreed with my writing because the state is limited and the citizens are free to do as they wish as farsighted as they do not interfere with other citizens rights. Marx would not have agreed with this because his philosophy of the state is communism. The three of these philosophers all agreed on certain aspects and disagreed on other aspects of my writing.