Compare & Contrast 3 Essays -- essays research papers

The three essays, "Thank god For The blood corpuscle Bomb" by Paul Fussel, "Democracy" by Carl Becker, and "Chief Seattle garner to President Pierce, 1855" are three different rhetorical modes of writing that exposits theoretical, face-to-face reasoning on the realities of certain controversial historical topics. The main concentrate of the essays are in proving a steadfast view of an ambiguous relegate through sarcastic criticism of opposing ideas and by applying clever use of goods and services of irony the authors sentiments vary from imperialistic to anti-imperialistic, and from attesting to detesting a past event."Thank immortal For The Atom Bomb" is a straightforwarfa ruby imperialistic literature which analyzes defecate and effect to al wholenessify the use of the Atomic bomb during World fight 2. The author continuously criticizes the evil of the Japanese in an attempt to dispose the reader why the "Japs" deserved what they got. He sites a Japanese control saying, "All Japanese must become soldiers and die for the Emperor" to conjure his point that the general mentality of the enemy was just that "implacable, treacherous, barbaric"(p460), and savage. He consistently acknowledges his up-close experience with the war to inform the reader that he has adequate basis for his analysis. But to reinforce his authenticity that his view is non just possessed by him ego, he borrows many asseveratements and examples used by others who destiny his ideas. The U.S. war committee already drew out plans for a all-out coastal assault and that was about to take action anytime if the bomb was not to be dropped, an armed invasion on the mainland would call for a darned massacre of unpredictable proportions on both the American and Japanese side. He noted a British observer saying "But for the nuclear bombs, ... they would have annihilated the lot of us"(p457). Just preventing an anticipated iodine million American casualties was sufficient cause for the Nagasaki bomb that "led to pacification"(p459).The effect of the bomb should be obvious that "the killing was all sack to be over, and peace was actually going to be the state of things"(p462). though not a very compassionate statement, it is true to the fact that the war was over and the killing has come to an end the reason being that the Japanese has already been killed. "We were going... ...ans dreams are hidden from us"(p409) concludes the sarcasm in referring to the white mans destructive motives as his endeavorous dream, something obscured from his inferior red counterpart.These three pieces of literature are exclusively fanatical essays preaching the negligent existence of ethical errors in people and in the general edict through different expository styles. All three rationalizes on swelled head superiority, the foundation of imperialism. Yet their philosophies are not exactly confo rming with one another. It can be derived from "Democracy" that the author dislikes people for labeling any fascistic government as democratic - thus a superior state - to justify for unrelated wars or revolutions (i.e. the Nazi imperialism) while "Thank God For The Atom Bomb" attests American righteous-superiority during the Pacific Wars and criticizes people who thinks his ideas imperialistic. Chief Seattle who hate against imperialism, can no doubt be seen as also possessing self superiority for it can be judged that he believes the red man to be superior, at least from a moral point of view. Therefore concludes the similarities and differences of the essays.