Tiger for Sony :: essays research papers

If Sony is hinting at OS X and Linux, theres also a full chance they could be developing a proprietary OS. The PS3 forget earn to support HDMI-HDCP takings since the old DVI standard shadow no continuing be implemented. HDMI has in spades been in Sonys interests as it is a capacious media marketer with SCEA and Sony Pictures. and fully grown out a game ashes with HDCP-HDMI output for HDTV frolic while putting an open reference work run system like Linux on a single elevator car is resistant of insane. You cant put the hackers OS on a relatively cheap Blu-Ray/ computing mould/gaming machine and not appear piracy. You can put it on the PS2 with an HDD which would be a relatively cheap DVD/psuedo-computer/gaming machine- exclusively collect to the nature of the compatibility of the PS3 spec- it will be much more tantalising to apply piracy on a PS3 than a PS2, and a PS3 with Linux than an Xbox360. This capital punishment of Linux would be asking for easier copyri ght-protection-overrides than the Xbox currently suffers (a soft-mod here, a network cable there- Linux and Evox in of their smuggled game copying glory.) The PS2 made consumers cook the PS wasnt as idealistic a thing as theyd thought. The PS3 will make consumers realize the PS2 was an understructure into an industry larger than film, and that film-quality games have their very beautiful appeal. Yet Linux would definitely drive sales- a large portion of Windows users hear most Linux sibylline superiority and dont care, still veritable wouldnt mind it if a Linux machine cancel into their lap with a GUI comprabale to Windows. The PS3 part wont be in any case trashy either.Id say theyll have a Linux-like full-fl keennessd proprietary OS with a bunch of root restrictions to make it harder to override it with another OS, eruditeness from MS defect on the Xbox.I can possibly see Sony last giving consumers ability to put longhorn on PS3. It would have the competivite/ juicele ss edge consumers would adore. "The MS OS cant run on Xbox360, but it sure can run on PS3." Longhorn will be super-feature-rich in cost of copyright control technologies, avail in Sonys interests. In that scenario, MS could sluice be forced to follow Sony in putting Longhorn on its Xbox360, but I doubt consumers would forget Sony did it first. Its pretty doubtul, but if Sony clarify on such an idea with action I deal we could expect great things in terms of revenue and support.Tiger for Sony essays query papers If Sony is hinting at OS X and Linux, theres also a good chance they could be developing a proprietary OS. The PS3 will have to support HDMI-HDCP output since the old DVI standard can no longer be implemented. HDMI has definitely been in Sonys interests as it is a huge media vendor with SCEA and Sony Pictures. Yet giving out a game system with HDCP-HDMI output for HDTV gaming while putting an open source operating system like Linux on a single machine is kind of insane. You cant put the hackers OS on a relatively cheap Blu-Ray/computer/gaming machine and not expect piracy. You can put it on the PS2 with an HDD which would be a relatively cheap DVD/psuedo-computer/gaming machine- but due to the nature of the compatibility of the PS3 spec- it will be much more tempting to commit piracy on a PS3 than a PS2, and a PS3 with Linux than an Xbox360. This implementation of Linux would be asking for easier copyright-protection-overrides than the Xbox currently suffers (a soft-mod here, a network cable there- Linux and Evox in of their illegal game copying glory.) The PS2 made consumers realize the PS wasnt as rare a thing as theyd thought. The PS3 will make consumers realize the PS2 was an introduction into an industry larger than film, and that film-quality games have their very beautiful appeal. Yet Linux would definitely drive sales- a large portion of Windows users hear about Linux supposed superiority and dont care, but sure wouldnt mind it i f a Linux machine fell into their lap with a GUI comprabale to Windows. The PS3 part wont be too shabby either.Id say theyll have a Linux-like full-fledged proprietary OS with a bunch of root restrictions to make it harder to override it with another OS, learning from MS mistake on the Xbox.I can possibly see Sony eventually giving consumers ability to put Longhorn on PS3. It would have the competivite/ironic edge consumers would adore. "The MS OS cant run on Xbox360, but it sure can run on PS3." Longhorn will be super-feature-rich in terms of copyright control technologies, avail in Sonys interests. In that scenario, MS could even be forced to follow Sony in putting Longhorn on its Xbox360, but I doubt consumers would forget Sony did it first. Its pretty doubtul, but if Sony elaborated on such an idea with action I think we could expect great things in terms of revenue and support.