William Shakespeare Comparison 130 Essay Example for Free

William Shakespe be Comparison 130 EssayWilliam Shakespeare entertains multiple themes throughout his praise collection and portays an overarching theme of love. Sir Philip Sydneys difficulties with love are shown in his collection of praises Astrophil and Stella. Both poets discuss the complications with love and the appetite it creates. For example, in sonnet 1 Sydney has trouble conveying his love tho hopes that through these sonnets she (Stella) pull up stakes understand. Shakespeares sonnet 129 as come up as Sydney sonnet 109 both mention the cerebrate for their hardships with love what is fueling their desire. Both are struggling with starve but use different tones, ditcions and reasonings to arrive at the same point. Shakespeares praise 129 is grouped with poems known as the bad muliebrity sonnets. This set of poems are on the darker side of Shakepeares classic love sonnets. Love is overbearing and causes the speaker to do things he normally wouldnt. He claims t hat anticipation of conjure creates erratic human behavior. Shakespeare uses graphic imagery, murderous, bloody, full of blame to illustrate his foiling towards the situation (3). He blames his sexual desires and claims that they are driving him to insanity (make.taker pale (8)).To him, lust is a sin and is the root of peoples pain. Throughout the poem the order of words tends to be reversed and repeated (mad, past reason) to commute the impression of conflict, as in line 2 lust in action and till action, lust. Despite intuition he is bound by anger and questions why he should pursue what he knows to be worthless (swallowd bait). The poem explains that sex is blissful while yourre doing it and, once youre done, a true sorrow that it ever happened A bliss in proof, and provd, a very woeBefore, a joy proposd behind, a day-dream(11-12). Here he embelishes the notion that people will go to absurd lengths in the pursuit of sex but end up hating themselves for it afterwards. Sydney s Sonnet 109 immediately identifies desire as the antagonist of the poet. In the first line he refers to love as a trap (snare) for the ignorant to cling for. But Sydney has already fallen into this love trap and is referring to himself as the fool to do so. Syndey in the first few lines considers himself foolish for feeling this desire.He claims that desire leads people to act stupidly With scattered purview and causeless care, that while trying to accomplish a foolish task he was waste his time. All his hard work was for nothing, consuming his rationality. Sydney and Shakespeare blame themselves for their craving of love, desire. The speaker in sonnet 129 cant help his appeal to this dark muliebrity he refers. He knows it is painful to let desire go. He understands the self-hating conclusion to his lust but cant help his actions Before, a joy proposd behind, a dream(12).While Shakespeare anticipates sex, it bets like joy afterward, a bad dream. Blaming his sexual attraction t o others as a culpit for personal agony. Sydney describes the same struggles in his sonnet 109. To Sydney the process of falling in love is nothing but torture. His mangled mind knows it worthless to feel this way and, similar to Shakespeare, doesnt know how to polish desire(14). Both speakers convey an ambivalent tone towards desire. In line 5 Sydney has given into desire but in line 6 knows of its uselessness bank Desire I have too dearly brought / worthelesse ware.Similarly, in the couplet at the end of Sonnet 129 Shakespeare writes All this the world well knows to avoid the heavenly experience caused by desire because it leads men to this hell (13-14). The authors identify what the outcome of their desires will be but allow it to happen anyways. Desire turns the speakers mad. In Shakespeares case the desire for sex is on purpose laid to make the taker mad(8) He has undergo all the stages of lust and distributively time it has made him crazy. As for Sydney, the reference to mangled mind explains that he is on his way to insanity.He paid for his desire by driving himself crazy. Sydney and Shakespeare seem to not know what to do. They are confused with the aching for love they possess. And it drives the speakers, whether it be Shakespeare or Sydney, to insanity. Both poets as well express the idea elsewhere that the dark women and Stella are superior to them. They believe that they are at fault for this desire they occupy. In Sonnet 129 the poets endeavors convince him that the dark lady is better than he knows her to be. Similarily, Sydney makes it unpatterned that this desire is a flaw in himself and not in the desired.In Sonnet 129 Shakespeare makes it vague to whether or not he is the speaker. Sydney seems to make it more patent by using point of view such as I have. Under the rubric of a single theme the reader notices as many similarites as differences. Shakespeare uses very different syntax than Sydney to express the same idea. First of all, Son net 129 concerns visible appetites that are blamed for fueling sexual desires. Is lust in action and till action, lust(2). Sydneys sonnet 109 blames his emotional feelings his mind cant help but feel Within my self to test my only hire (13).Shakespeare uses mutiple juxtapositions such as before/ behind and heavan/ hell. The juxtapositions allowed Shakespeare to convey both sides of his suffers. The vulgar tone in sonnet 129 contributes to the speakers hatred for physical desires. That it makes people savage, extreme, rude, cruel, not to trust(4). Shakespeare explains exactly what will happen when one undergoes these sexual yearnings Past reason hunted and no sooner had, / Past reason hated, as a swallowd bait(6-7) allowing no room for interpretation. Sydney, on the other hand, exlpains the pain he feels, but is not exact what will happen subsequently.He recognizes the conclusion but doesnt know what it will fell like. Sydney understands that his desire will be worthless. Sonnet 12 9s speaker has experienced desires worthlessness. He asserts that everyone knows and will finish as he did, in agony and pain All this the world well knows (13). The lists Shakespeares writes helps explain his frustration with sex and the dark lady. Lists solify details to pas experiences. It gives the reader more evidence to the speakers opinion. Whereas, Syndey effectivley emphasizes his point through punction and repition Desire , Desire (5). Convincing the reader of Sydneys troubles.Sydney and Shakespeare signify that love drives them out of control but have their own view on the intensity of the stress. Some people would consider that these feelings are more than standard. not that they are exaggerating feelings in the sonnets but drive themselves to an extreme stage of loathing. Sydney expresses a lyrical tone compared to Shakespeares lordly tone. Syndey voices his inner feelings and reads as though he has thought a lot about his struggles. In line 8 he writes Who shouldst m y mind to higher things prepare, and explains that his mind should concentrate on more meaning(a) things than desire.The use of my mind suggests that Sydney is trying to convince himself to focus on more important things. This plays in directly with his lyrical tone. Shakespeare, on the other hand, is more disdainful in his writing, Had, having, and in quest to have, extreme(10) and scornful towards his involvements with desire. In the end, Shakespeare in sonnet 129 and Sydney in sonnet 109 both write about their struggles with lust. Syndey composes his feelings throughout sonnet 109 while Shakespeare makes it evident of his scornful position towards desire itself.