.

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

A Whistle-Blower for All Seasons

Whistle-blowing has had a long and venerable tradition in the history of politics. From Cicero and his Catiline Orations to Cynthia barrel maker at WorldCom, whistle blowers have existed for as long as there was governmental intrigue and power on the line.For this essay, however, the focus will be on one particular famous historical whistle-blower Sir doubting Thomas More, a former chancellor to Henry VIII of England. This essay will strive two things to compare Sir Thomas More to recent famous whistle-blowers and to check over what makes an effective whistle-blower.By way of background, in 1534 King Henry VIII of England seek an annulment from his premier wife, Catherine of Aragon, in order to marry Anne Boleyn. (Brigden) More resigned from the Chancellorship when the face Parliament enacted several acts designed to wrest authority over the side church service from Rome when the Kings annulment was refused by the Pope. (Williams) He was eventually executed for his refusal to cooperate.Sir Thomas More, as portrayed in Robert drive offs play called A Man For All Seasons, is the penultimate cosmos of conscience. In one of the more famous lines from the play, Sir Thomas answers Norfolks pleas for crime syndicate on the matter of the Act of Succession by replying, And when we stand in the lead God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, and I am blamed for non doing according to mine, will you come with me for fellowship? (Bolt)This shows the esteem with which Sir Thomas More held the human conscience, and deemed that a man ought to live and die by the dictates of that conscience.This particular trait is something he shares with modern-day whistle-blowers like Linda Lewis of the Food synthetic rubber and Inspection Service of the US Department of Agriculture, who blew the whistle on her deputations lack of preparedness in the event of a terrorist attack. She claimed that some(prenominal) More and Martin Luther were her inspirations when she made the decision to blow the whistle, quoting Martin Luthers Peace if possible, that truth at any rate. (Andersen)Sir Thomas More likewise had the advantage of a strong faith, which lent him transcendent moral ideals. He was the Kings good servant, but Gods first, whose answer to Norfolks questioning of the c at one timept of Apostolic Succession1 was, But what matters to me is not whether its true or not but that I believe it to be true. (Bolt) His faith was tied to his notions of conscience, and a violation of a transcendent moral principle was more intolerable than political and personal upheaval. Whistle-blowing potbelly be a very isolating act.A whistle-blower often breaches expectations of committal from the group he or she belongs to. (Bok) This leads to retaliation from the group the whistle-blower once expected to be safe in. However, a transcendent belief, be it in the form of ethics, religious beliefs, community allegiances, ontological securi ty, economic security or political ideology, helps whistle-blowers identify with a higher authority and gives them the fortitude to go through with the act and withstand the strong pressure to conform. (Jasper)More shares this trait with FBI whistle-blower Fred Whitehurst, who claimed that his religious faith sustained him in his decision to against his superiors in a matter of evidence tampering. (Andersen)1 Apostolic Succession is the doctrine that all bishops of the Church are successors of the Apostles, with the Pope succeeding St. Peter.

No comments:

Post a Comment